In Colorado's Corrupt 7th Judicial District
$250,000 Bonds Are The DA's Best Legal Tool
M.P.D. Grossly Errant Accident Reconstruction -EXPOSED-
http://www.judicialcorruption.org/
_________________________________________________________________________________
We are going to seek to have this case commuted and demand public apologies from the MPD for Det. Schnelling's perjury and from the State of Colorado for the misconduct of Judge Mitchel and the 7th's D.A's office. The actions of this rogue-rat pack have split families and destroyed public trust in the community.
_________________________________________________________________________________
Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct:
The continued existence of a free and democratic society depends upon recognition of the concept that justice is based upon the rule of law grounded in respect for the dignity of the individual and each person's capacity through reason for enlightened self-government. Law so grounded makes justice possible, for only through such law does the dignity of the individual attain respect and protection. Without it, individual rights become subject to unrestrained power, respect for law is destroyed, and rational self-government is impossible.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
This is a publication of permanent public record and is protected under the provisions of the 1st Amendment of The United States Constitution... Special attention has been given to historical accuracy.
Corruption Watchdog Presents:
|
... Comes now the Kangaroo court in Montrose, Colorado. A bastion of judiciary tyranny? Notorious, Dishonest court officials, ex-cop judges cower behind layers of security while trashing the lives of local residents and terrorizing everyone. ...Nothing is too low if it's necessary to win the case for the State of Colorado... J. Mitchel runs a Lawless court ignoring the Rules of Evidence, Rules of Criminal Procedure and the Code of Judicial Conduct. As long as "107 ft. of skid marks -inside a 76 ft. intersection" stands as evidence in Montrose County Court; Judge J. Mitchel stands unopposed as the most corrupt judge on American soil. Every single case needs quality control peer review. The Savage Seventh By Eddy LaBarr |
M.P.D. Grossly Errant Accident Reconstruction -EXPOSED-
| Our sincerest
condolences are extended to the family and friends of Emma Loss, a
decent Montrose resident. An apology is also extended to the
community on behalf of the Montrose Police Dept for their errant
investigation of the event, falsification of public records, and wanton
perjury in court -necessitating this expose'.
The state has failed to provide remedies for Det. Schnelling and Judge Mitchel's perjury. This issue presents as well the unresolved problems remaining from this incident, and raises the need for further prevention of more. Bitterness remains to date in the way the 7th did this. It's impossible to avoid restirring the emotions from the tragedy and should the need to bring forth further litigation arise in order to establish the truth and regain circumspect; Judge Mitchel & Det. Schnelling will both be defendants in a federal Civil Rights action, as the state provides no protection or remedies for the acts by city and state government officials. |
107 feet of skid marks? MPD; through false accident reconstruction deliberately added up to 33 additional feet of skid marks to the report they submitted to the court under oath, creating a false impression that would enrage any reasonable person. I was getting flipped off afterwards by somebody, one of the angry relatives. Another relative of the family, inside MPD conspired with Schnelling for the outstanding false evidence on record today. Judge Mitchel stands behind the false evidence generated by the MPD, attaching his reputation and the reputation of the 7th Judicial District upon it's inaccuracies.
Mitchel needs to resign in order to restore the public trust and dignity to the 7th. ...Open lying in court by public officials terrorizes the community and destroys public trust... Can anyone even get a fair trial in Montrose? When the basic pillars of justice are upended and the public is subjected to a uncontrollable free-for-all frenzy by corrupt, lying ex-cop judges and shyster District Attorneys, What Next?
|
June,
2002: A lone MPD officer directs traffic at the scene
of a tragic accident at the intersection of South 5th Street and
Townsend Ave in Montrose, Colorado. The distance between the
crosswalks is 64 feet. MPD's accident reconstruction team
willfully submitted erroneous accident recon testimony to the
court, under oath that there are 107 feet of skid marks inside this 76.6
foot intersection. Their reconstruction claims concluded a false
vehicle speed of 49.333 mph (in a 30 mph zone), when the actual speed
was 35 mph. The false speed was mentioned over 20 times in the
sentencing and was an aggravator in sentencing, causing the
victim to receive a year in jail based primarily on perjury.
This abomination still stands untouched as the 7th Judicial District's County Attorney demands that Expert Witnesses be physically present in court -in Montrose, instead of appearing via phone. This clever policy blocks presentation of exculpatory evidence by creating a 5-figure up-front cost to the person they've framed and leaves a textbook example of a typical case wherein the State of Colorado prevails in court and the truth doesn't. These 107 feet of skid marks will forever stand in public record as a Career Hallmark of Assistant District Attorney Myrl Serra, Kangaroo Judge Mitchel, M.P.D. Chief Meecham, Marc Schnelling and outlines the credibility of the entire Montrose Police Dept. This author believes none of the perps should be entitled to Any pension benefits. Judge John Mitchel collaborated with MPD by embellishing their perjury and performing a theatrical exaggeration of the false statements. He added an unforgettable, disgusting, life ruining exhibition in the courtroom. At the beginning of the sentence Mitchel clamored for an article regarding his sentence as he was going to "make an example." Dare not anyone mention the subject of Fairness in Mitchel's court lest you unleash a debacle of colloquial gabble as he compares his sentences to each other with the merits of a Shakespearean College actor. ...Well Mr. Mitchel, Here Is The Article You Requested And This Example Is A Long Way From The Finish Line... Sections of the sentencing transcript are published on these pages as further formal complaints are pursued. MPD chief Meecham and Mitchel need to resign in order to restore the public trust and dignity to the 7th. This is an "Example" of the need for a housecleaning within the 7th. Requests for prosecution in other serious cases may actually be withdrawn altogether due to the absence of honesty and judiciary integrity. ************************************************************* MPD's accident reconstruction
pro ignored the vehicle registration in his hand which stated the Dodge
Ram 2500 had a diesel engine. He submitted information to the court
which came from MPD used a fictitious vehicle weight of 5783 LBS when the vehicle's actual weight was 7390 LBS. There were several elements which were blatantly misrepresented and incorporated into the sentence. By lightening the vehicle 1600 LBS, adding at least 33 feet of skid marks and further switching the 2770 pound (Vehicle-2) with the 5783 pound (Vehicle-1) in the accident reconstruction software, MPD was able to come up with an outrageous speed of 49.333 mph in a 30 mph zone. *************************************************************** Here are some of the initial notes made by a competent accident reconstruction specialist as the corrected reconstruction began: The Marks, post POI and disengagement from W2, end in the crosswalk on the north side of the intersection. The width of 5th Street, if we are to believe the MPD measurements, is 54ft wide on the MPD accident report and the MPD to-scale diagram. A cross walk is eight feet wide. 54 + 8 = approximately 64ft. The MPD accident report states that W1 skidded 74ft to POI and 33ft post POI to POR = 107ft. Thus, and without accurate measurements of the intersection, where did the MPD get the additional 107 – 64 = 43ft of W1 skid marks? ************************************************************** |
MPD/MITCHEL: Presents yet another flimsy case in the 7th with a $250K Cash-Only Bond used as a judiciary tool.
http://web.archive.org/web/20010517005638/http://www.amoralethics.com/
Any questions regarding the content or opinions published here? Contact the author: <hiatus@qwest.net>
... What result could possibly be expected from the act of intentionally altering testimony in open court other than a complete loss of credibility???
*****************************************************************************************************
Here are statements from pages 9, 10 and 67 of the sentencing transcripts published in support of this author's allegations:
Page -9 -L: 25 through Page -10 L: 7:
Serra (Assistant District Attorney): Now this Mr. Baker is coming from the opposite direction, he's going south towards Ouray, but did he indicate to you what the status of the traffic signal was?
Schnelling (MPD's accident recon Expert): He said the southbound lights for him were a solid red. Moments before this he had been traveling south at about 30 miles per hour and was able to come to a stop without any emergency action and had actually been stopped at the stoplight for several SECONDS when he saw the impending crash.
______________________________________
Page -67 -L: 10 through 12:
Mitchel (during the theatrical reading of the sentence): traffic, for example, in the opposite lane, rather than the southbound lane of Townsend, had already stopped for several MOMENTS.
****************************************************************************************************
Mitchel intentionally created a flat out lie and incorporated it into the sentence. He was sitting on the bench at a side profile, "singing" exaggerations of MPD Detective Schnelling's grossly errant testimony. Mitchel started to say SECONDS, which would've been an accurate recital of Schnelling's statements a few minutes earlier, but I noted that that in this sentence he said, "had already stopped for several SEC/...MOMENTS." Mitchel's eyes turned and looked me right in the eye as he (intentionally) altered this. It was very intentional, deliberate and directed at this author.
Mitchel materially misrepresented statements of the errant MPD detective's earlier testimony and incorporated it as fact, creating a false impression which affected me personally, above and beyond the inappropriate over sentence given to Montrose resident; Donald LaBarr Sr. Mitchel intentionally inflicted emotional distress upon this author.
Page; 70 Lines: 4 - 7: (Mitchel embellished perjury): ...And I will note that Detective Schnelling's statement was not "the vehicle was at 49 mph in a 30 zone", his statement was "it was a minimum 49 mph in a 30 zone."
*****************************************************************************************************
A Motion For Stay of sentence was presented to Mitchel's court and some 60 pages of supportive information exposing MPD's gross errors were presented in the motion which was part of a "Rule 33 (c) hearing," as the court had very obviously based it's findings upon false testimony. Mitchel was presented with irrefutable evidence that the information he had relied upon in sentencing was completely wrong - and he refused to consider it, irretrievably destroying his own credibility and damaging the 7th Judicial District.
...Mitchel denied the motion for stay of sentence, setting a formal hearing date almost at the end of the sentence, leaving his victim in jail with his closing remark being a statement from the defendant trusting Mitchel's judgment going into sentencing -which would've been moot altogether after the 33 (C) hearing. Mitchel and Deputy Attorney Serra made certain that their victim would serve out the full sentence before it could be reviewed.
*****************************************************************************************************
RELIABLE INFORMATION?
Sentencing transcripts:
Page; 62, Lines: 10 - 25
Mitchel: "Now with regard to the information that has been presented today, the law in Colorado, as well as throughout all the states and the federal system, is very very clear, that only reliable information may be considered by a court at sentencing. Mr. Mehlig's point about multiple hearsay is well taken, so I will not consider any multiple hearsay in making a determination on what sort of sentence to offer.
The District Attorney's office proposes that the only real purpose we can achieve today is punishment because of a problem with no publicity, for instance, insofar as deterrents of other people. And I am frustrated. I don't see anyone from the press here, and perhaps I missed someone. But I don't see anybody, and I am very frustrated about that. But that is not going to form my decision simply because no one is here to perhaps write an article..." (This IS the article you requested)...
*****************************************************************************************************
1)-Mitchel intentionally lied in court.
2)-Mitchel embellished the perjury of a lying MPD Detective.
3)-Mitchel accepted and incorporated false information into consideration as fact.
4)-Mitchel refused to take corrective action when it was revealed he'd relied upon perjury.
5)-Mitchel's actions have undermined the credibility of ALL of the 7th Judicial District.
6)-Mitchel intentionally over-sentences his victims, comparing them to other persons he also over-sentenced.
Mitchel's immediate and unconditional resignation is demanded.
Any questions regarding the content or opinions published here? Contact the author: Hiatus@Qwest.net
MPD interrogators were EXTREMELY derogatory to a female witness, friend of the defendant, in the case. ...More on this coming soon...
____________________________________________________________________________________
Ron Branson.
...Thanks Ron, I'll add to
that; "Death to the firstborn of these human Rights rapists."
Upcoming: The Police and the People
There are TWO LEVELS of justice in Montrose, Colorado. One for the police which includes even their most remote family relatives and another for the rest of the peasants who live here. County court judge Mitchel makes examples out of the peasants while there is not a force on Earth which can bring prosecution in cases of police malice or incompetence...
We're just getting started here folks. There will be several more pages which will help bring the truth into the light of day. Stay Tuned...